Why Recession Doesn't Really Matter to Investors
By
Timothy Lutts, Chief Investment Strategist and Editor of
Cabot Stock of the Month ReportRecessions, defined technically as two or more successive quarters of negative real economic growth, and officially (by the National Bureau of Economic Research) as "a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months," are natural, particularly for a mature economy such as ours.
Our current slowdown was initiated by the ending of the housing boom and the resulting evaporation of easy credit. The reverberations from that have affected lenders of all sorts and, in turn, affected most consumers, who suddenly feel they have less to spend.
At the same time, the high price of oil and gas means it's costing us all more to fuel our cars and heat our houses. And we're seeing higher prices for food, too, in part because of the fuel costs involved in food transportation, in part because of the booming, federally subsidized ethanol industry. (China, by contrast, which apparently has no lobbyists from the grain industry, has banned the use of grain for ethanol production, but I'll say no more on that subject; the ethanol issue deserves its own column some day.)
If you want to blame somebody for the current situation you can blame any combination of the following.
A. The Chinese, and their growing appetite for food and fuel
B. The politicians and lobbyists responsible for the ethanol legislation
C. The oil-producing states of the Middle East
D. The environmentalists who've blocked drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
E. The automotive manufacturers who continue to sell us gas-guzzlers
F. The "predatory" lenders who misled "innocent" borrowers
G. The lying homebuyers who borrowed more than they could pay back
H. The baby-boomers who drove real estate prices higher and higher over the past four decades in their quest to have it all
I. The folks who won World War II and came home and had all those babies!
Well, that last one may be going a bit far. My point is that the situation is multifaceted. There is no one culprit, and there is no one solution.
Eventually, however, when real estate prices fall low enough, the patient value-oriented souls who've been waiting for bargains will come out of the woodwork and start buying. They'll buy individual houses, apartment buildings, entire condominium projects and more. Downtrends will end. The recession will end. And the U.S. of A. will return to its pattern of slow growth.
But should you wait until then before you invest? No.
One of the most common mistakes made by individual investors is assuming that stocks follow the news, and that by logically analyzing and reacting to the goings-on in the world, they can make money. The truth, however, is different.
All stocks trade on expectations of the future. When newbies buy a stock based on a favorable press release and pop a stock up for the day, who's selling to them? The experts, who quietly accumulated their positions in the weeks and months before the announcement.
Similarly, when a stock is trending down for no obvious reason, it's because savvy investors are looking ahead and perceiving (most commonly) that earnings growth in the future will not be as good as expected. That's the situation today.
Knowing this, do you closely follow the economic news to determine when the recession will be over before you invest? Or do you watch the charts to determine when the market downtrend has ended?
Answer: You remember the immortal words of Jesse Livermore, who wrote, "Markets are never wrong; opinions are." And you watch the charts!
Which is why all the talk about a recession means little to me. I'm watching the charts...which look lousy. And I'm looking for promising stocks to put on my watch list.
More Cabot investing advice
Receive investing tips via email every week. Sign up for our free e-newsletter,
Cabot Wealth Advisory.Yahoo FinanceGoogle Finance